By Rafiq
With the killing of ISIS members, certain things emerged from the obtained documents and confessions that exposed the sources behind the assassinations of regional figures, insecurity, and threats and harm to the world.
When a system becomes so overwhelmed by the absence of its own law and internal stability that, for controlling situations, giving responses, and carrying out hidden conspiracies and plots, it uses the name and label of terrorism and groups hostile to Islam and Muslims, this indicates that such a system becomes not only a source of harm for its own people, but also a security threat to its neighbors and the world.
You see in the world the maps of those two coercive states (Pakistan and Israel), which were drawn through coercion, and which over the past several decades have caused immense harm to the world, humanity, and neighboring nations. Through their conspiracies and plots, they have achieved many foreign and domestic objectives, and from time to time their role has also been exposed.
These two “coercive states” constantly create new situations of corruption and security threats in the region, so that under the name of insecurity they may advance their objectives, interests, and hidden plans.
They give the world the slogan of fighting against terrorism, but in reality the same circles create and nurture such groups. What is most notable is that the killing of a member of ISIS named Muhammad Iqbal in Orakzai, Pakistan, once again exposed the links, support, and cooperation between ISIS, intelligence agencies, and the military, showing how the authority, benefit, and organization of every attack and strike is in the hands of the army and intelligence.
The question is: is this really ISIS, or are these people being used as hired operatives by the military?
Repeated evidence and actions regarding ISIS have made it clear that the name ISIS is only used by the Pakistani military and intelligence circles for their own objectives. When the people in that country see ISIS centers, it feels as if they are military or ISI camps.
The use of such military and intelligence locations, and then recruiting, attracting, and training people there under the name of ISIS, proves that ISIS is a new creation and instrument of the Pakistani intelligence and military circles.
This is because the objectives that they cannot achieve openly and directly are carried out through this name and label. If we look at the documents and individuals linked to ISIS, most of these people are citizens of the same land; secondly, they have employment or cooperation links with the army and intelligence; and thirdly, full coordination with the army and intelligence is seen both inside and outside the country.
What do the internal assassinations in Pakistan and the security threats carried out under the name of ISIS actually mean?
When a country loses internal stability, economic value, and public legitimacy, the resulting public dissatisfaction and increase in security incidents are used by the government to present itself as engaged and active. The same ISIS that was created for foreign countries is now being used inside its own country.
Moreover, the name and label of ISIS have often been used against scholars, political and military opponents of Pakistan, or in the assassination of prominent and educated figures within Pakistan.
